Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cris.unibe.edu.do/handle/123456789/234
Title: | Validation of a Spanish version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire | Autores: | Muñiz, K. S. Cedeño, Koraima Carson, K. A. Pandya, P. R. Kikuchi, J. Patterson, D. Blomquist, J. Jacobs, S. Chi Chiung, G. C. |
Researchers (UNIBE): | Cedeño, Koraima | Affiliations: | Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud | Research area: | Ciencias de la Salud | Issue Date: | 2021 | Publisher: | Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd. | Source: | Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, 27(11), 701-705 | Journal: | Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery | Volume: | 27 | Issue: | 11 | Start page: | 701 | End page: | 705 | Abstract: | Objective: The objective of this study was to validate a Spanish version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ). Methods: Validation and reliability testing of the Spanish version of the PIKQ was conducted in 2 phases. In the first phase, a translation-back-translation method by 6 bilingual researchers was utilized to generate a final Spanish translation. In the second phase, bilingual women were randomized to complete the Spanish or English version first, followed by the alternate language. Agreement between individual items from English and Spanish versions was assessed by percent agreement and κ statistics. Intraclass correlation coefficients compared overall PIKQ scores and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI) subscores. To establish test-retest reliability, we calculated Pearson correlation coefficients. In order to have a precision of 10% for 90% agreement, so that the lower 95% confidence interval would not be less than 80% agreement, 50 bilingual participants were required. Results: Fifty-seven bilingual women were randomized and completed both versions of the PIKQ. Individual items showed 74%-97% agreement, good to excellent agreement (κ = 0.6-0.89) for 9 items and moderate agreement (κ = 0.4-0.59) for 14 items between English and Spanish PIKQ versions. Intraclass correlation coefficients of the overall score and POP and UI subscores showed excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81-0.91). Pearson correlation coefficients between initial and repeat Spanish scores were high: overall (r = 0.87) and for POP (r = 0.81) and UI subscores (r = 0.77). Conclusions: A valid and reliable Spanish version of the PIKQ has been developed to assess patient knowledge about UI and POP. |
URI: | http://cris.unibe.edu.do/handle/123456789/234 | DOI: | 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001027 |
Appears in Collections: | Publicaciones del Área de Salud - Medicina Publicaciones indexadas en Scopus / Web of Science |
Show full item record Recommend this item
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.