Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||An interdisciplinary intervention program to prevent early childhood caries in the Dominican Republic||Autores:||Abreu-Placeres, Ninoska
Ekstrand, K. R.
Garrido, L. E.
|Researchers (UNIBE):||Abreu-Placeres, Ninoska||Affiliations:||Centro de Investigación en Biomateriales y Odontología (CIBO)||Research area:||Ciencias de la Salud||Keywords:||Dental caries; Pediatrician; Prevention; Early childhood caries (ECC); Oral health||Issue Date:||2023||Publisher:||Frontiers Media S.A.||Source:||Frontiers in Oral Health, 4, 1176419; 2023||Journal:||Frontiers in Oral Health||Volume:||4||Issue:||1176439||Abstract:||
Objective: The principal aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to test the effectiveness in the prevention of Early Childhood Caries (ECC) through an educational intervention program with the use of a printed guide for pediatricians and parents both designed by pediatric dentists.
Materials and methods: After ethical approval, the first step was to design the educational guides, which were based on the information obtained from a focus group with pediatricians (n = 3), phone interviews with mothers to toddlers' (n = 7), and the best evidence available about children's oral health. For the RCT, 309 parents with their 10–12 months old children were randomly allocated to either the intervention or the control group. Parents in the intervention group received oral health education from the pediatricians supported by the printed guides. Parents in both groups received an oral health kit with a toothbrush and toothpaste at the first visit as well as at each 6-month follow-up visit. After 18 months the children were evaluated using ICDAS criteria.
Results: At baseline, data were available from 309 children (49.8% girls). The mean age of the children was of 10.8 months (SD = 0.8) and 69.3% had not had their teeth brushed with toothpaste. After 18 months, a total of 28 (22%) children in the intervention group and 44 (24%) in the control group were clinically examined. Regarding the number of tooth surfaces with caries lesions, the children in the intervention group had a mean of 6.50 (SD = 6.58) surfaces, while the children in the control group had a mean of 5.43 (SD = 4.74) surfaces with caries lesions. This difference was not significant (p = 0.460).
Conclusion: The RCT showed no effectiveness in caries-progression control. Despite this result, this study managed to identify barriers that do not allow pediatricians from offering parents adequate oral health recommendations. With this learning, it is possible to work on collaborative programs with pediatricians that over time likely will increase dental health by controlling for ECC.
|Appears in Collections:||Publicaciones del CIBO-UNIBE|
Show full item record Recommend this item
Files in This Item:
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License